work culture — eUbD Resilience Resources

In this episode of Meaningful Work Matters, host Andrew engages in an insightful conversation with Frank Martela, PhD about the nature of meaningful work, the dimensions of well-being, and the interconnections between sustainability and human thriving.

Dr. Martela is an Assistant Professor at Aalto University, Finland, with dual doctorates in organizational research and practical philosophy. His work focuses on meaningfulness, human motivation, and how organizations can unleash human potential. A renowned expert on meaning and happiness, his research seeks to understand the fundamentals of happiness, meaningfulness, and the good life.

Defining Meaningful Work

Martela begins by discussing his influential research on defining meaningful work. He explains that meaningful work generally refers to work that has intrinsic value beyond just financial compensation.

Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, Martela and his colleagues identified three key dimensions of meaningful work: overall significance, self-realization, and broader purpose.

Overall significance refers to the sense that work is worthwhile and valuable in itself.

Self-realization involves the ability to express oneself and engage in activities aligned with one's interests and values.

Broader purpose encompasses the feeling of contributing to something beyond oneself and having a positive impact on others or society.

Martela emphasizes that meaningful work involves both a connection to oneself and a connection to others or the wider world. This conceptualization provides a useful framework for understanding and fostering meaningfulness in various work contexts.

The Relationship Between Meaning and Purpose

An interesting discussion unfolds about the relationship between meaning and purpose, two concepts that are often intertwined in research and popular discourse.

Martela offers a nuanced perspective, suggesting that meaning is a broader concept encompassing all things that make life or work feel valuable, while purpose is more future-oriented, involving goals and projects that contribute to meaning. He notes that while purpose is often a key source of meaning, meaningful experiences can occur without explicit purpose, such as enjoying time with friends.

This distinction helps clarify the roles of meaning and purpose in both work and life contexts, highlighting the importance of considering both in efforts to enhance well-being and fulfillment.

The Dark Side of Meaningful Work

While meaningful work is generally associated with positive outcomes, Martela acknowledges potential downsides. He points out that people who find their work highly meaningful may be more susceptible to exploitation or overwork. Additionally, strong dedication to meaningful work might lead to neglecting other important life domains, resulting in work-life imbalance.

These insights underscore the importance of maintaining balance and boundaries, even when engaged in deeply meaningful work.

A New Model of Well-being

Martela introduces his innovative model of well-being, which is grounded in human needs and nature. The model consists of four dimensions:

Having: Meeting basic physical and safety needs.
Loving: Fulfilling social needs and relationships.
Doing: Engaging in purposeful activities and growth.
Being: Experiencing positive emotions and life satisfaction.

This framework offers a nuanced approach to understanding and measuring well-being, with potential applications in both policy and organizational contexts.

Applying the Model to Work Contexts

The conversation explores how Martela's well-being model can be applied specifically to work settings.

In the workplace, "having" involves basic safety, security, and fair compensation. "Loving" at work relates to belongingness, community, and supportive relationships. "Doing" encompasses learning, growth, competence, and purposeful impact. "Being" reflects job satisfaction and positive emotional experiences at work.

This application provides a holistic lens for evaluating and enhancing employee well-being across multiple dimensions. Soren and Martela discuss how these concepts can be measured and implemented in organizational settings, highlighting the importance of both comprehensive annual surveys and more frequent, simplified check-ins to gauge employee well-being.

Sustainability and Well-being

The episode concludes with a discussion on the crucial relationship between sustainability and well-being. Martela argues that the ultimate goal of politics and policy should be to promote well-being in a sustainable manner. This involves recognizing environmental limits and planetary boundaries, designing economic and social systems that maximize well-being within these limits, and developing standardized measures for both well-being and environmental impact to inform decision-making.

Martela emphasizes the need for an integrated approach to human flourishing and environmental stewardship, highlighting the importance of long-term thinking in our pursuit of well-being. He suggests that by considering well-being and sustainability together, we can create policies and practices that support human thriving while respecting the constraints of our planet.

Resources for further exploration:

For more information on Frank Martela's work and the topics discussed, listeners are encouraged to explore his website and visit the Aalto University website.

Mijeong Kwon, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Management at the University of Colorado Denver Business School. Her research focuses on the social dynamics of work motivation, particularly how people communicate and judge motivations for work.

Dr. Kwon's recent findings suggest that those who love their work often see this intrinsic motivation as a moral virtue while viewing working for money or recognition as less moral. She explores how this moralization of motivation can alienate colleagues and hinder the recognition of diverse work motivations.

The Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation

Kwon introduces the concept of the moralization of intrinsic motivation and explains that it involves attaching positive values to intrinsic motivation.

Intrinsic motivation refers to engaging in work because it is inherently enjoyable or satisfying. When individuals moralize intrinsic motivation, they begin to view it as the "right" reason to work, while other motivations, such as financial gain or fame, may be seen as less virtuous or even wrong.

Positive and Negative Outcomes of Moralizing Intrinsic Motivation

Kwon's research highlights both the positive and negative consequences of moralizing intrinsic motivation. On the positive side, individuals who moralize intrinsic motivation are more likely to possess and cultivate it in others, leading to increased intrinsic motivation within an organization. This can result in higher levels of engagement, satisfaction, and overall performance among employees.

However, there are also significant negative outcomes. For instance, individuals who moralize intrinsic motivation may experience guilt if they struggle to maintain their intrinsic motivation. This can lead to unnecessary stress and self-doubt, even if they are performing well at their jobs. Additionally, moralizing intrinsic motivation can cause individuals to neglect less interesting but essential tasks, potentially leading to self-exploitation and burnout.

Cultural Differences in Intrinsic Motivation

Kwon's research also explores cultural differences in intrinsic motivation.

She observes that people in the United States generally report high levels of intrinsic motivation, while it is lower in East Asia. Interestingly, intrinsic motivation levels in Latin America are even higher than in the United States. This suggests that the phenomenon of moralizing intrinsic motivation is not limited to one specific culture but may be prevalent in various regions around the world.

Implications for Managers and Leaders

Based on her findings, Kwon offers several recommendations for managers and leaders.

Firstly, she advises acknowledging and validating different reasons why employees work. Leaders should share personal stories that highlight the various benefits of their job, such as flexibility, to validate diverse motivations.

Secondly, Kwon suggests creating an environment that sustains and cultivates intrinsic motivation rather than emphasizing it directly. This can be achieved by providing low-risk learning opportunities and practicing transformative leadership to inspire employees.

Lastly, she emphasizes the importance of having clear guidelines for performance appraisal to avoid subjective value judgments. This helps ensure that employees are not left guessing about how they will be evaluated or feeling pressured to work excessive hours to demonstrate their passion.

The Role of Purpose in Organizations

Soren and Kwon discuss the increasing emphasis on purpose in organizations, particularly through initiatives such as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) priorities, and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

While these efforts are generally seen as positive, Kwon cautions that they can also lead to the moralization of intrinsic motivation, which may have unintended negative consequences.

Kwon notes that in nonprofit organizations, where employees are often intrinsically motivated and paid less, there is a higher likelihood of moralizing intrinsic motivation. This can result in difficulties finding equally passionate colleagues and may lead to feelings of frustration and isolation among employees.

Diversity of Motivations in the Workplace

One key takeaway from the conversation is the importance of recognizing and valuing a diversity of motivations in the workplace. Soren and Kwon agree that having employees with different motivations, including those driven by utilitarian reasons, can create a stronger and more balanced team. Such diversity can help maintain boundaries and ensure employees do not become overly consumed by their work.

Kwon also mentions that organizations that emphasize both financial success and broader social goals tend to attract more employees. When employees know that the profits of a company will directly benefit them or other stakeholders, they are more likely to feel a sense of reciprocity and be motivated to contribute to the organization's success.

Final Thoughts

While intrinsic motivation can lead to greater engagement and satisfaction, moralizing it can negatively affect individuals and organizations. Managers and leaders should strive to create an inclusive work environment that acknowledges and values diverse motivations while providing clear performance guidelines and fostering a sense of purpose that benefits all stakeholders.

References

For more information on the topics discussed in this podcast episode, you can visit the following links:

Balancing Passion and Boundaries: Lessons from Frank Martela